It’s not looking good.
It’s not looking good.
They’re trained on technical material too.
The animation stuff you mentioned exists today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt1yNJ180Cs
We need, Standard Fruit.
Is this an attempt to beat those monopoly allegations?
They tried to make video game rentals illegal in the US. They’ve always been a shitty, anti-consumer company.
Nintendo has always been an underhanded bully. This isn’t new.
Damn, that’s all we get.
I wanna believe you, but the JPEG artifacts on an image that small make it extremely difficult to even notice the distortions you’re referring to, especially at a glance. You’ve made it obvious you’re replying in bad faith, so I’m gonna leave it here. Have a good one.
That’s a lot of things to infer off of just scrolling past a 512×768 JPEG. If the image was in another context and the text had been different, no one would have batted an eye.
That isn’t extremely obvious though, especially with the JPEG compression. If you didn’t know to look, you wouldn’t have noticed it. No one scrutinizes Jeopardy text.
Yeah, but the point isn’t to look like a legit Jeopardy clue, it just has to not look generated. You can respect the height limit if you want, or break it.
Your reply also wasn’t in the form of a question. No points.
I think something innocuous or inoffensive enough to most people qualify as “good looking”. I mean, that’s how marketing works.
A generated image could be so good you’d never be able to tell. Like this one:
I think the real complaint here is about bad looking art. Not a lot of people have an eye for picking out good-looking images. Or this person is just a huge snob.
You can never learn anything with these clickbait headlines.
You’re good to go as long as it’s original enough. If it isn’t then that’s just copyright infringement. You might as well have right-clicked “save as”.
This isn’t always true.
This show just keeps hittin’.
We can’t have shit under capitalism. The only rights Nintendo recognizes is your right to give them money.