Nah, you’re right. I used it wrong.

Bucket lists are usually for life goals, so it’s a bit dramatic to say it for a T.V. show.

I was trying to be brief and was also typing in a hurry.

I went cuckoo for cocoa puffs long ago.

Your logic is undeniable.

However.

Frosted Flakes are gr-r-reat! 🐯

I agree, but respectfully, I’m not sure what this has to do with my comment. 😭

Oh dang, I was told it didn’t matter which instance I joined. 😭

I chose it from some join Lemmy website.

Nothing on that website or on the instance sign up page shows the settings or permissions of the instance. It would be nice to view those before signing up.

This.

I support AI, but I don’t understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing.

OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.

How do you use it?

Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.”

We’d descend into a dark age for science.

Nice, that’s on my bucket list.

Experts often disagree.

If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.

🧐

Where is this from? 🙏🏼😭

Now we gotta find the machines that can make both pet and human wet food and treats.

Oh no. 😭

Only teenagers? 😭

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD’s have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn’t make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I’m correct, it’s not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it’s because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

Yeah, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

AI can type tedious snippets faster than me, but I can just read the code and revise it if needed.

This seems like a game you’d do with other programmers, lol.

I can understand using AI to write some potentially verbose or syntactically hell lines to save time and headaches.

The whole coding process? No. 😭