developed by a private company, smh literally unplayable
developed by a private company, smh literally unplayable
you dip the chicken nuggets in whiskey and then roll them in cocaine for a nice speedy schnitzel
http://github.com/matrix-org/dma-demo-app-bridge-whatsapp
This is one thing I’ve found on their github so far, but it seems inactive.
There is a fork that element seem to have forked back:
http://github.com/element-hq/mautrix-whatsapp
from
interesting thanks, that’s cool to hear. Sad that there’s no effort to move to a standard protocol, but understandable.
why would we be able to? are the any plans to open them up?
That’s the point of the repuation system.
It’s a very hard problem, I’ll give you that.
What you need is, each instance and community collects reputation in the federation. then users posting on those instances can collect reputation on those. basically by not being banned or massively downvoted. Your reputation is weighted by the reputation of each you collected it from instance.
Each users identity is tied to some key that collects reputation, that you generate new identities from from for each instance/community/post. Like how some credit card services give you a new credit card number for each new website.
Admins don’t know who you are, but they can see and verify your reputation.
Then instance/community admins can decide if they want a different weighting. For example, to completely disregard the reputation by some instance or make one you like 10x more important.
You could get an ordered list of posts or pseudonymous users based on the reputation. Untrustworthy users will glow like a christmas tree.
That would be one way to do it. It’s hard to make it water tight, but any improvements would be better than the current fediworse.
It doesn’t have to be.
You could keep the general structure and functioning while improving privacy.
For example, by obfuscating post history, anonymous posting or assigning a user pseudonym per instance/community, auto-deleting old posts/comments. All optional features of course. Let instances/communites decide which of these features they want.
Keep the structure of Lemmy with it’s Reddit-like-ness and instances, but give users, instances and communities more control over data privacy.
Sure it’s harder to implement, you need some minimal-knowledge reputation system, but there is nothing fundamental preventing that from being possible.
The nice thing about federation is that one instance/community can stay the same data-leaking privacy mess, if they so prefer. While others could operate analogous to 4-chan (or anything in between).
Lemmy is absolute garbage on privacy. I would love a private Lemmy with fine grained privacy controls.
what do you use for illegal documents?
That’s just the data after which the microplastics have aged to their finest toxicity
this is wrong, because today you won’t find the thing you’re looking for at all. Just 100 results where one word of your 5 word query vaguely matches.
the sacred chants!
what is a prophesh yonnels
I wish they would release cheapish cards with huge cheap VRAM for consumer AI. But I guess even the cheapest memory is too expensive for that.
The results I get from music-map are insulting
what in the Aeon Flux (2005) is this?
Comment on Lemmy with a vague textual reproduction 🤯
dub dub dub dub dub dub dub dub
devil’s advocate: this will save the vast majority of user (which are completely tech illiterate) from loosing their most important data
lets be real, none of them will use a private or foss backup solution any time soon.
I’d rather not they loose their important family photos for that oh so horrible crime of offending my privacy nerd sensibilities