Well obviously Geralt survives in the end of witcher 3 and most likely will be alive in 4, but what I meant is that they might kill him in the new game like they did with Vesemir in Witcher 3. They don’t need to, and I hope they don’t, but it would be kind of an easy plot device so there’s a chance. But at this point it’s just speculation anyway.

My main point was more in line that some people just don’t like change and that would be enough to make them oppose Ciri as the main character.

I can’t understand hating Ciri as a chracter, but I can understand being kind of a disappointed not having Geralt as a playable character.

If you consider it as an isolated game it doesn’t matter, but when you play three games as one character and then suddenly switch to another character it can feel kind of melancholic, in absence of a better word. Especially since now there’s a non-zero chance that they’ll kill Geralt in the new game.

But anyway, Ciri was an interesting character and those parts in Witcher 3 where you played as her were great.

That’s taking it too far. To beat the bad guy with water we just need good guys with water.

Even if Assad is defeated, the war is most likely far from over, the rebels are probably just going to end up fighting each other.

But the fertility rate has nothing to do with deaths.

May I introduce you to emojicode…

Could be, but at least when I try to google that artefact I get results which show 1200-1600.

CE would mean less than 2000 years, also I believe they ment 1200-1600 instead of 600.

You have indeed been mishearing it, since the lyrics say cats.