• spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    no, i have no belief regarding the world’s population in either direction. this comment pretty much explains the rest of my position.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          “Positive” eugenics is also eugenics, i.e. nations that want more (insert racial or ethnic group) and encouraging those groups to reproduce are engaging in eugenics.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            i don’t disagree but positive eugenics is literally not the topic at hand that’s why no one had brought it up

            • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              The OP isn’t about eugenics of any sort. No one was talking about (negative) eugenics either until someone shoehorned it into the conversation.

              I think it is intellectually dishonest to mention one type of eugenics while completely ignoring the other type, hence my bringing attention to a topic which has already been broached.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                intellectually dishonest

                ok well what do you want me to say about it lol, the conversation was kind of already had before you showed up here