A Telegram user who advertises their services on Twitter will create an AI-generated pornographic image of anyone in the world for as little as $10 if users send them pictures of that person. Like many other Telegram communities and users producing nonconsensual AI-generated sexual images, this user creates fake nude images of celebrities, including images of minors in swimsuits, but is particularly notable because it plainly and openly shows one of the most severe harms of generative AI tools: easily creating nonconsensual pornography of ordinary people.

  • echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    The people being exploited are the ones who are the victims of this, not people who paid for it.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It seems like there’s a news story every month or two about a kid who kills themselves because videos of them are circulating. Or they’re being blackmailed.

        I have a really hard time thinking of the people who spend ten bucks making deep fakes of other people as victims.

        • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I have a really hard time thinking

          Your lack of imagination doesn’t make the plight of non-consensual AI-generated porn artists any less tragic.

      • Vanth@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        How are the perpetrators victims?

        I could see an argument for someone in need of money making AI generated porn of themselves. Like, don’t judge sex workers, they’re just trying to make money. But taking someone else’s image without their consent is more akin to Tate coercing his “girlfriends” into doing cam work and taking all the money and ensuring they can’t escape. He’s not a victim nor a sex worker, he’s a criminal.

        • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Writing /s would have implied that my fellow lemurs don’t get jokes, and I give them more credit than that.

          • Vanth@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I would love to assume Lemmy users are intelligent enough to realize text-only sarcastic jokes about sex criminals are almost never a good idea, but alas, I’ve been on the internet longer than two weeks.

            • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              Some people just don’t have a sense of humor.

              And those people are YOU!!

              Thanks for the finger-wagging, you moralistic rapist!

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      No one’s a victim no one’s being exploited. Same as taping a head on a porno mag.