• AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      8 months ago

      He told friends he was going there to drive an ambulance, but in an interview admitted he had become a ‘soldier of the new Russia’ after reading pro-Communist propaganda online.

      Was homeless and a heroin addict. Thinks Russia is Communist, apparently. Nazi, no. Chucklefuck, yes.

      • popcap200@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Honestly, I’m so confused why radical leftists are so pro Russia. It’s not like they’re communist anymore. In fact, they’re an authoritarian kleptocracy, which sounds like the type of government the folks on hexbear and lemmygrad would like the least.

        • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Even some people that experience the “real, existing socialism” can be pro russia…and they had to experience the worst part of it.

          “But we had work back then and funny parades” is a hell of a nostalgia drug.

          • reinei@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Also the way worse option of we had work often comes into play from people who lived in the Soviet Union and now have a stable job: everybody had to work or you were homeless/starved! Nobody could slouch off of my hard earned tax money and live a comfy life!

            Which is like, what? The bare minimum socialism a country could have aka “if you are out of work (hopefully temporarily but we’ll see) we are at least not letting you starve completely/immediately” is somehow too much now‽

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The simple answer is Russian propaganda.

          Sadly, some leftist brothers and sisters are fooled into supporting an authoritarian, imperialist, murdering kleptocracy.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh yeah, didn’t you know to truly commit to denazification you have to get in good with the national front.

      It’s crazy to see this guy in front of a communist flag, and directly next to that is the US Confederate stars and bars.

      • theodewere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        these guys are just looking for a legal means to be violent, they don’t care how that happens or who bestows that power on them

  • BoisZoi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The irony of holding an Irish flag and fighting for Russia. Fucking twit.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was reading the whole thing going “oh Jesus please not one of us” then reached the part where he’s just a fuckwit and breathed a sigh of relief.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t let him back in the uk. Simple as that. Rescind his citizenship. The government are too cowardly to do that.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Legally a person cannot be made ‘stateless’ - unless they have an alternate citizenship to fall back on, you cannot revoke theirs, no matter how reprehensible they are. The ISIS volunteers from Europe weren’t made stateless, just very dead or arrested

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not defending her, in fact I find her actions completely repellent, but Shamima Begum is walking proof that the UK has and will readily make a UK national stateless if it wants to do so, AND defend that legal position indefinitely throughout as many international tribunals as it takes.

        Born in the UK, traveling on UK documents, and ostensibly holding UK citizenship, Ms. Begum went to Syria in 2015 to fight for ISIS. As a response to her requests to return to the UK when she got to the FO part of FAFO, the UK home office removed her UK citizenship in 2019 and are fighting her efforts to get it back even now, five years later. Just two days ago she lost another court battle to get her UK citizenship back.

        While citizenship in the UK is not based on place of birth (jus soli), the government of Bangladesh holds that she does not and has never had Bangladeshi citizenship via jus sanguinis. The UK courts decided that she was a Bangladeshi citizen from birth, but that doesn’t make it so except in UK law. There is no actual citizenship for her in Bangladesh. For the purposes of winning in court, the UK is simply creating a legal illusion of citizenship for her in Bangladesh where one does not exist, and so far it’s working for them. There is no alternate citizenship in reality.

        Ergo, Ms. Begum is, in fact, rendered stateless by the actions of the UK. This condition is 100% the legal creation of the UK as its own response to her reprehensible actions, and has nothing at all to do with Ms. Begum’s place of her birth or her lineage.

        Bangladesh says she is not a citizen of Bangladesh. The UK says she is not a citizen of the UK. She does not have any right or claim to citizenship in any other country or territory.

        Ms. Begum’s situation is, literally, the exact definition of statelessness:

        In international law, a stateless person is someone who is “not considered as a national by any state under the operation of its law.”

      • WatTyler@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If he was an ethnically Bangladeshi teenage girl, we in the UK could definitely find a way to render him stateless.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Doesn’t really matter either way, he’s not coming back, the way the war is going he’ll probably be blown up at some point, and if he does survive he’ll be arrested. His nationality is basically not relevant.

  • m13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    Imagine this being the cause you voluntarily fight for. What a fucking loser.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was going to write that this seems like a shitty paper, with the unprofessional writing and typos. Then I saw it referenced a Mirror article. Turns out they lifted much of the wording from the Mirror, but not all of the punctuation. So they took shitty writing and made it worse.

    • WatTyler@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      IIRC the Mirror and the MEN are owned by the same company (alongside most other ‘local’ papers including the Birmingham Mail and the Bristol Post).

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        So they might have the right to copy the text. But they still screwed it up.

        In another video posted at the weekend, Stimson makes it clear who he is fighting for Russia.

        The ending reads like a grammatical error. But in the Mirror they used a dash. At least that looks more clear, although I’d prefer a colon.

        In another video posted at the weekend, Stimson makes it clear who he is fighting for - Russia.

        • WatTyler@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Absolutely. Just a warning that one’ll drive themselves mad if they dig into every error produced in any Reach publication with the sheer amount of content they publish so quickly.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t intend to dig in! But it’s like entertainment journalism: there’s a very low bar!

            This seems like something that will move to GPT very quickly (if it hasn’t already).