Of course, not Tomi Lahren though…

  • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fun Fact: Rot Brain Peterson has, on the record, unironically advocated that “society needs to work to make sure men are married” so they don’t become violent.

    And he says feminists are the ones besmirching masculinity.

    • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Incredible, he’s infantilized men into big dangerous toddlers that throw a violent fit when they don’t get what they want.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The best part is his incel base ate it up and assumed he meant government-issued sex slaves, so he clarified that he just meant society, aka the literal patriarchy, needs to shame the very idea of not being in a monogamous hetero couple so hard it is socially unacceptable to do anything else (you know, again)

    • Gorilladrums@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Military aged men (usually aged late teens to mid 40s) have historically been the drivers of society. If a significant chunk of this demographic feels lost, hopeless, and close to the brink, then that’s when all hell breaks loose. From insane crime rates to extremism to war to riots to revolutions to you name it. I don’t think Peterson is suggesting that society should do mandatory marriages or anything like that. He’s just pointing out that the data shows that marriage improves the happiness and quality of life for men (and women), and it will be a net benefit to society to try and increase the marriage rates as opposed to doing nothing and keeping the current trends going.