Interesting article didnt know where it fit best so I wanted to share it here.

  • CountZero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    We can’t rule out something as impossible just because we haven’t observed it yet, as it would directly contradict the scientific method

    Figuring out what’s possible versus impossible isn’t really part of the scientific method. The scientific method is about collecting and interpreting evidence. Where is the evidence that particles are conscious?

    Until there is a testable hypothesis, panpsychism doesn’t have anything to do with science.

    Others in this thread have already explained that consciousness doesn’t play any role in the double slit experiment. I definitely understand your confusion there. I believed the same thing at one point. It doesn’t help that some people purposely spread that false interpretation of the experiment because it’s more interesting than reality.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would help if we started explaining that an “observer” in quantum mechanics is another singular quantum particle like an electron or a photon. To “observe” means to collide or entangle.