• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    We already saw it happen when OSX share increased and Apple had to abandon the whole “Macs don’t get viruses” schtick.

    It’s kinda crazy that Apple got away with spinning “Our products don’t sell well enough for this to be a problem” into a marketing point for as long as they did.

    • Bimbleby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      I assume they said it was due to other reasons than obscurity, although we know better.

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        It was due to other reasons, too.

        One of the main malware vectors back then was Internet Explorer (and specifically ActiveX), Outlook Express, and MS Office macros. That’s not just a matter of obscurity; it’s because Microsoft specifically wrote very shitty software with no regard for security. Netscape was not nearly as exploited as IE even when it was the leading browser.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Apple always does that. After iAds failed, they pivoted into advertising a privacy focused ad campaign to counter Google. Had iAds succeeded, they’d be perfectly fine into getting into that business.