• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Personally, I think it would be easier for all involved to just fine based on a percentage of global annual revenue from the date of the violation to present. If they want personhood so bad, then they can have this too.

    Edit for an example: let’s say Intel does anticompetitive behavior 15 years ago and a court case finds them liable for damages today. Add up the last 15 years worth of global revenue, and take a percentage of that.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      9 months ago

      Making it easy is precisely not the point. Having to deal with auditors combing through your accounting records and overseeing your operations until every dollar of illegally gained revenue is accounted for is the point.

      The consequence should be onerous, cumbersome and embarrassing for the company.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I get what you mean, but I prefer massive fines due immediately vs expensive and drawn out processes. Using my example, the very absolute bottom of the barrel Intel’s fine could be is a percentage of over $500B (Intel’s revenue in 2009 was $35B, multiplied by 15). Even at 1% based on this floor, the fine would be over $5B.