Alabama is seeking to put a second inmate to death using nitrogen gas, a move that comes a month after the state carried out the first execution using the controversial new method.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s office asked the state Supreme Court on Wednesday to set an execution date for Alan Eugene Miller. The state said Miller’s execution would be carried out using nitrogen. Miller, now 59, was convicted of killing three people during a pair of 1999 workplace shootings in suburban Birmingham.
“The State of Alabama is prepared to carry out the execution of Miller’s sentence by means of nitrogen hypoxia,” the attorney general’s office wrote, adding that Miller has been on death row since 2000 and that it is time to carry out his sentence.
If they can’t properly enact what should’ve been a painless execution, how do you expect them to properly anesthetise someone?
Isn’t the danger of improperly applying anesthesia that you could kill someone?
Of an overdose sure, but if they botch it the other way, there’s a good possibility the prisoner never properly goes under or they wake up during the execution, either way experiencing the full pain of death.
That I’d figure is the worse of the results, and likely the one that’d happen given these guys seem to have a knack for torturous executions.
Isn’t that still better than no anesthesia at all? Assuming that the execution method wasn’t changed to be worse.
Technically speaking yes, but that assumes they’re treated the same. It’s almost certain that if the executioners are under the illusion their anesthesia has worked, they’re not going to do things in such a way as to minimise pain.
Prisons seem determined to turn executions into torture sessions - and while the need for capital punishment can be debated all day, we can all agree that the death is supposed to be the punishment, not the procedure.