The United States vetoed an Arab-backed U.N. resolution Tuesday demanding an immediate humanitarian cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war in the embattled Gaza Strip.

The vote in the 15-member Security Council was 13-1 with the United Kingdom abstaining

It was the third U.S. veto of a Security Council resolution demanding a cease-fire in Gaza.

  • Astrealix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not Gaza, the West Bank. Gaza hasn’t been settled since 2005, just blockaded and stuff (which is still very bad)

      • Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, if you are to judge the country by the worst amongst them, there is basically not a single country with an ounce of morality — but Ben Gvir and Smotrich etc. would never manage to get that to happen because the West Bank means more to them and Bibi knows it, and it’s also more strategically wise for them to leave Gaza alone and quietly continue settling the West Bank. Even during this war Bibi has claimed that they won’t try to settle Gaza, and again, why would they? Most Israelis don’t want it, the US doesn’t want it, not even the fairly right-wing Netanyahu wants it, and it’d cost massive political capital for very little gain.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The Israeli’s have also protested Netanyahu staying in power and this genocide. I don’t think they care what the people want.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      They even forcefully removed their settlers out of Gaza, emptied thriving settlements as a gesture of good will. They were almost immediately thanked for it by bombs, rockets, shootings and other attacks while the Palestinians in Gaza razed productive greenhouses and tore up irrigation pipes as they took over these settlements. It was a slap in the face, shortsighted idiocy by the Palestinian leadership and, sadly, a taste of what was to come.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They also blocked anything moving into or out of Gaza. Which is an Act of War. Don’t forget that part.

        • Astrealix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I do agree that it is bad; but you do need both sides to negotiate to actually get peace. Israel unilaterally offered a de-escalatory move, and what ended up happening was Hamas taking over from the PA. Nothing happens in a vacuum — just like how Israel’s action there wasn’t without cause either, but designed to put the issue on the backburner. But it was still a move towards what could have been a peaceful (though likely uneasy) coexistence which Hamas made impossible

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            what ended up happening was Hamas taking over from the PA.

            What happened was Hamas got elected on a moderate peace seeking platform. And Israel blocked them from taking their place in West Bank while assassinating political leaders who were calling for a 1969 peace.

            Just keep leaving key things out. It doesn’t make you look bad at all.