Developers do not share their views, ideas or statements in any way. Simple pure development.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 months ago

    FOSS by its very nature is political.

    And are there any large distros that say much beyond “we don’t condone bigoted behaviour”?

    But I guess some people see that as a controversial statement for some reason.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    Bad luck mate all development has bias. There is no escaping it. If you want the least then grab the Linux kernel and roll your own distro.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m reminded of an hbomberguy quote: “A lot of people think politics can be a turnoff for gamers, but I’ve done research and discovered that politics is objectively fun and ALL gamers love it ALL the time. And the people who say they hate seeing them in games love them even more, they just wish they were seeing different politics.”

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    So basically you are looking for a Linux distro without an open source license? And probably without a license at all…?

  • wiki_me@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    What “political linux distributions” exist? I use debian and used Ubuntu before and don’t remember anything political about it (At least by going by the how most people perceive something as political, That is the state should do X or not Y).

  • fr0g@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Personally, I would suggest antiX Linux. It is well known that the antiX name is supposed to stand for “anti politiX”