• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    But that policy creates a window for literally any accusation to be made. “Proof would encourage or glorify the behavior” basically means you get to accuse anyone of anything at any time .

    • jubalvoid@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      The proof is NCTA and Gilead pausing ad spending. This isn’t some crazy conspiracy theory, hate groups have always been on Twitter and musk’s gutting of the moderation and safety teams certainly didn’t make that better. There’s literally no logical reason to think cnn would lie about this, I’m honestly confused why y’all are being weirdly defensive and contrarian over this.

    • PotentiallyAnApricot@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry, but i’m going to have to see this reply as bad faith. There’s no good reason to think the news outlet in question skipped the entire journalistic process and ‘has no proof’, so I can only assume you have another reason for sowing doubt about the legitimacy of the story.