nifty@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agoThe first reason should be enoughlemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1528arrow-down111
arrow-up1517arrow-down1imageThe first reason should be enoughlemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squaremogoh@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up13·7 months agoI don’t know. I played 3.5 and 5e and I like the 5e rules way more than 3.5. Isn’t PF very close to 3.5?
minus-squarevithigar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·7 months agoFirst edition Pathfinder was very close to 3.5. Many people called it 3.75e. While some of the D&D bones are still there, Second edition Pathfinder is very much its own thing.
I don’t know. I played 3.5 and 5e and I like the 5e rules way more than 3.5. Isn’t PF very close to 3.5?
First edition Pathfinder was very close to 3.5. Many people called it 3.75e.
While some of the D&D bones are still there, Second edition Pathfinder is very much its own thing.