dampfnudel@lemmy.zip to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhy would someone choose ubuntu server over a headless debian installation?message-squaremessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1120arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1107arrow-down1message-squareWhy would someone choose ubuntu server over a headless debian installation?dampfnudel@lemmy.zip to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square109fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretwistypencil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·1 year agoUbuntu solutions are Debian solutions
minus-squareMaharashtra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·1 year agoUbuntu is what grew out of Debian. But it’s radically different ENVIRONMENT these days.
minus-squaretwistypencil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoYeah, but the essentials still map like 90% of the time, unless you are using their paid stuff
minus-squareMaharashtra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoI agree, but the question wasn’t about the percentage of cases, but about the possible reason to choice Ubuntu over Debian…
Ubuntu solutions are Debian solutions
Ubuntu is what grew out of Debian.
But it’s radically different ENVIRONMENT these days.
Yeah, but the essentials still map like 90% of the time, unless you are using their paid stuff
I agree, but the question wasn’t about the percentage of cases, but about the possible reason to choice Ubuntu over Debian…