• derpgon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I kind of agree. While I think they are not that bad as far as advancements go, most of it is shitstained by Musk, who has to be seen at all cost and have to be seen as the ultimate inventor of everything.

    He wants to be seen, stay relevant, and be the boss of everything, that he usually makes dumb decisions, which is a stain on a company mostly relying on a foundation of very intelligent people.

    • astral_avocado@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree with your assessment except saying that SpaceX’s advancements are “not that bad” is a massive understatement. They’ve completely disrupted and forever changed the space launch industry, with the help of government subsidies.

      Everyone also forgets how Starlink is serving remote indigenous communities and scared the pants off shitty dominant ISPs that have been screwing rural communities over since forever.

      I’ll re-emphasize my point that I think the results of some large companies, which comprises the efforts of many many smart people, can have facets of it be considered overwhelmingly good.

      Edit: some more words

      • masquenox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whenever I hear someone unironically use the term “disrupted” I just know I’m going to be hearing some capitalist parasite being glorified for doing something expensive that a government did much cheaper half a century ago.

        • astral_avocado@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Space launches were “much cheaper” a half a century ago? You don’t really follow any space news whatsoever do you? That’s patently false.