kurumin@linux.community to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前Lazarus hackers now push Linux malware via fake job offerswww.bleepingcomputer.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1182arrow-down1external-linkLazarus hackers now push Linux malware via fake job offerswww.bleepingcomputer.comkurumin@linux.community to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 年前Zip too? I thought only on Windows, while tar retains unix permissions.
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 年前All archive formats do it, afaik.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前But i’m sure there was an issue somewhile ago, because zip only preserves Windows permissions…
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 年前There’s a bunch of zip implementations(Info-Zip, Gzip, 7-Zip, PKZip, Pigz, etc.), so perhaps an older version of one of the implementations didn’t support preserving the Linux executable permission in the past.
Zip too? I thought only on Windows, while tar retains unix permissions.
All archive formats do it, afaik.
But i’m sure there was an issue somewhile ago, because zip only preserves Windows permissions…
There’s a bunch of zip implementations(Info-Zip, Gzip, 7-Zip, PKZip, Pigz, etc.), so perhaps an older version of one of the implementations didn’t support preserving the Linux executable permission in the past.