the current state of search engines (music video)
www.youtube.com
you did not heed my warning and now we're all doomedfollow me:https://twitter.com/savannahXYZarthttps://www.tiktok.com/@savannahxyzarthttps://www.artstation....

What’s your opinion? Does google really “not work” anymore? Are there any better search engines? Why did the quality of search results go down? I honestly stumbled onto this question through this music video, what is ironic in it’s own way i feel…

  • asap@feddit.de
    17·
    1 year ago

    I need an engine where if I put something in quotes it appears on the site, visible to the human eye

    I can confirm this works on Kagi:

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      9·
      1 year ago

      I’ve just recently started using Kagi. It’s great, it’s fast, I love that I can raise, lower, or block certain sites in the results.

      However, $5 a month for up to 300 queries is pretty steep for the average user. Well, not for the average user (apparently the average google user only searches 100 times a month) but I used up the 100 demo searches over about 48 hours, mostly just researching for responses to lemmy comments.

      I subscribed anyway. And I understand search engines are not cheap to run. But time will tell how much this will end up costing in the long run, and if it’s worth it over a free one with an ad blocker.

      • coldredlight@beehaw.orgM
        4·
        1 year ago

        I became a paying subscriber for kagi today. The way I justify the cost is it’s saved me time digging up technical information at work and that increase in efficiency is worth money to me. Also, I hate ads and SEO crap, and $5 isn’t really that much these days. I’m trying to reduce my reliance on Google so it’s nice having an actual superior search experience, even if I have to spend a little money for it.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          2·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I tend to try to support new projects doing things different just because I want them to grow. At the moment it costs them approx 1.25 cents per search, which is what pricing is based on (they also need to offset the searches for free trials so the price is a little higher) but presumably there are fixed costs that will mean this cost can come down as the userbase grows. $5 is also not much to me, but it can mean a lot to the service which is young and founder-funded.