The Defense Department will install solar panels on the Pentagon, part of the Biden administration’s plan to promote clean energy and “reestablish the federal government as a sustainability leader.”

The Pentagon is one of 31 government sites that are receiving $104 million in Energy Department grants that are expected to double the amount of carbon-free electricity at federal facilities and create 27 megawatts of clean-energy capacity while leveraging more than $361 million in private investment, the Energy Department said.

The solar panels are among several improvements set for the Pentagon, which also will install a heat pump system and solar thermal panels to reduce reliance on natural gas and fuel oil combustion systems

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    10 months ago

    Greenwashing is harmful because it tricks people into thinking there’s been progress and we aren’t on track for the collapse of civilization.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        10 months ago

        By trying to present the Pentagon as environmentally friendly, instead of one of the worst polluters on the planet.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          By trying to present the Pentagon as environmentally friendly

          The only person presenting that narrative is you. Just read the article:

          ‘Brendan Owens, assistant secretary of Defense for energy, installations and environment, said the projects will improve energy resilience and reliability at the Pentagon and other military sites in the U.S. and Germany. He called energy use "central to everything we do.’‘’

          ‘Solar panels will provide "an uninterrupted power source’’ at the Pentagon in case of a cyberattack or other outage to the bulk grid, as well as reduce strain on the building’s power load, Owens said in an interview.’

          Its not about “green” to that member of the Defense department, its about continued operation and money. Yes, it will also reduce green house gas creation, but the Defense department isn’t even making that claim.

          So what you’re doing is putting words in their mouth, then calling them hypocrites for using that language you created. Thats a straight up straw man fallacy you’re using.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            10 months ago

            Uh huh, and you think they reached out to the media to create this headline because they want us to be informed about building maintenance. Okay lol

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I saw this and thought: “Hey, that’s a good first step, I wonder how long it is before they take another?” Not that the pentagon went green. Check your bias.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            Taking steps that do nothing in lieu of steps that do something is the definition of greenwashing.

            Your response:

            “Hey, that’s a good first step, …"

            Demonstrates the effectiveness of the seeded story. Propaganda and marketing work.

            • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Wow, do you not understand incremental progress? And I never said that they were green. You can acknowledge progress (however slight) without being a stooge. So, what’s the amount of progress that it would take before you stop complaining about the small steps?

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh I do understand the philosophy of incrementalism.

                I understand the consequences and costs of failing to take bold action to do what is necessary to change the course of a situation.

                Small steps have only taken us backwards, and it gets worse every cycle. Only bold steps and decisive actions have moved us towards a more perfect union.

                Not understanding the cost of small steps forwards on a train that’s hurtling in the wrong direction is meaningless. Its justification is to support the problem while being able to rinse your hands of the issue. The justification of smalls steps as progress while we’re clearly regressing is the fundamental problem we face as a society, because time, space, and oppurtunity are limited, you will only get so many opportunities to take action. When we either decide to take small steps, or accept them out of others, we further the issue.

                Incrementalism as a social philosophy is a failure, and is costing us our ability to survive on this planet, its costing us our ability to have a civil and just society.

                  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Sorry, I’m too busy to return to the trees, too busy taking bold and decisive action.

                    I’ll return to the trees some day, when my work is done.

                • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Dude, this conversation is a great example of letting perfect being the enemy of good. Organization takes a step in the right direction, and wack jobs come out of the woodwork because it wasn’t a complete change that would have taken decades to finish

                  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Dude, this conversation is a great example of letting perfect being the enemy of good. Organization takes a step in the right direction, and wack jobs come out of the woodwork because it wasn’t a complete change that would have taken decades to finish

                    We’ve been ‘accepting’ the good in earnest now for around 50-60 years under the modern global political hegemony. How is that going? Has the world been improving? We get bold decisive action when it relates to things that make life worse for all peoples, and we get incrementalism when it comes to actions which would improve peoples lives. This is the true cost of incrementalism. Its why the world is fucked. No. Halfway solutions aren’t good enough. In fact they are actually worse than no solution at all because the take the space and opportunity where a significant action can be made.

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      As much as I hate the military industrial complex, symbolic actions matter, and we need some form of military so as long as we have a military I hope it will utilize green energy when possible.

    • KNova@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      the alternative is imminent collapse of civilization and no solar panels

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        the alternative is imminent collapse of civilization and no solar panels

        This thinking, the entirety of its attitude. Its why fascism was able to take root in the US.

        Its the other half of the mechanism in a ratchet effect that slow walks us into deterioration.

        Only revolutionary action and upheaval can take us back.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not going to fucking care if the Pentagon has solar panels while I’m fighting to the death over the last unopened can of beans in an abandoned Walmart.

        • KNova@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, I get it. Not sure that stating the doomer case is any better than installing solar panels, though, is my point. It gets us the same outcome in the end.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            If people actually realized how fucked we are they wouldn’t settle for greenwashing. We could get organized and fight back.