Police were dispatched toward Smith’s residence but were called off when they learned it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

Special counsel Jack Smith, who is overseeing the prosecution of former President Donald Trump in two federal cases, was the target of an attempted swatting at his Maryland residence on Christmas Day.

According to two law enforcement sources, someone called 911 and said that Smith had shot his wife at the address where Smith lives.

Montgomery County Police dispatched units toward the home but were called off when the Deputy U.S. Marshals protecting Smith and his family told police that it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

No arrests have been made in connection with the incident.

  • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because our phone regulations are absolute shit now and thus it’s much easier to hide this shit with everything now.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t answer my phone either. I have a special Ring tone for the family, that’s it. At work I got moved to a new location and asked me if I needed my phone. I said no and haven’t used the office phone since. I email companies and setup in person meetings or teams meetings. There’s no need for a phone at work if one can just do teams.

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yes, the telephone regulation is the issue. Remind me though, which statutes exactly?

      Edit: still haven’t heard anything about which technologies aren’t regulated enough to prevent swatting, or what regulations could be implemented to prevent swatting. How about instead of downvoting, you guys go come up with some examples, and if they’re already laws on the books you have to take back the downvote. No? Shocker, that.

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s the regulations that don’t exist when we’ve got new technology that needs to be regulated that are the problem. And sorry, I don’t have a list of every telephone regulation on me to go through and tell you which ones, nor the time to do so.

          • cogman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            VPNs, virtual numbers, voip, and tor are somewhat new and fairly unregulated. It’s dead simple to setup to make a very hard to trace phone call.

            • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              None of those are traditional phone services, they’re all internet based so regulated differently. I agree they should be regulated as telephone utilities but right now they’re not.

            • voracitude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh go on, come up with something instead of just downvoting me. I know it’s hard, actual work even, but you’re never gonna change minds otherwise.

              • cogman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Oh go on, come up with something instead of just downvoting me. I know it’s hard, actual work even, but you’re never gonna change minds otherwise.

                Dude, I just responded to you and did not downvote, calm down. Maybe take some of your own advice about anger?

                • voracitude@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  17
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  What advice was that, and who’s angry? I’m frustrated, sure, because perfectly reasonable statements are getting the most ridiculous pushback. “Phone not regulated enough” indeed 🙄

                  • Agrivar@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    who’s angry?

                    REALLY bro? Pretty obvious the snarky douche arguing all over this thread has some serious anger management issues.

            • voracitude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’ve posted it elsewhere, but those are all just technologies (and of those, only Tor could be considered close to “new”), and we don’t need special regulation to make it illegal to do crimes with them. Even still, those just make it hard for normal people to track; it’s a minor inconvenience for the US Government, at most.

              But again, if you think regulations are lacking, offer some solutions! The only rule is, you can’t get mad at me if what you come up with is already a law on the books.

              • cogman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                it’s a minor inconvenience for the US Government

                Citation needed.

                Even if I granted the US gov as being all seeing, a major problem is that it requires local PD/prosecutors to get the feds involved.

                I’m not actually on board with attacking this via phone system regulations, but It is fairly easy to make anonymous phone calls using the techniques I pointed out. To actually fix something like this, you’d need every phone number to be registered in person with a star card and to completely outlaw virtual numbers providers with stiff penalties. But even then, there’s the issue of international numbers and illegally spoofing a number. Those can’t be fixed without revamping the telcos which is really hard with the amount of ossified tech in place.

                This probably won’t happen in my lifetime, but the two things that need to happen are reducing gun ownership and demilitarization of the police. Cops are way too trigger happy, actual consequences when cops murder or harm individuals would go a long way in stopping them from perceiving everyone as an enemy combatant. Pulling guns off the streets would reduce the justifications of busting down doors with a dozen cops ready to shoot anything that moves.

                • voracitude@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  17
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Bro. The original post I was responding to said phone regulations. That’s the entire discussion. The fact that you lot haven’t worked with three-letter agencies to know the kind of resources they can bring to bear finding someone isn’t my issue. Disbelieve it if you like, but as you freely admit phone regulations are not the fucking problem.

                  • cogman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    To actually fix something like this, you’d need every phone number to be registered in person with a star card and to completely outlaw virtual numbers providers with stiff penalties. But even then, there’s the issue of international numbers and illegally spoofing a number. Those can’t be fixed without revamping the telcos which is really hard with the amount of ossified tech in place.

                    This is exactly what you ask for (I’m guessing you didn’t read the full post).