Don’t get me wrong. I love Linux and FOSS. I have been using and installing distros on my own since I was 12. Now that I’m working in tech-related positions, after the Reddit migration happened, etc. I recovered my interest in all the Linux environment. I use Ubuntu as my main operating system in my Desktop, but I always end up feeling very limited. There’s always software I can’t use properly (and not just Windows stuff), some stuff badly configured with weird error messages… last time I was not able to even use the apt command. Sometimes I lack time and energy for troubleshooting and sometimes I just fail at it.

I usually end up in need of redoing a fresh install until it breaks up again. Maybe Linux is not good for beginners working full time? Maybe we should do something like that Cisco course that teaches you the basic commands?

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish the Linux community would do a better job of separating the software updates from the core operating system and user space apps. I feel like most distros do the ‘move fast and break things’ approach, even if that isn’t what they intended to do. I forget which distro it was, but they tried replacing X11 with Wayland way before the other distros, and IIRC, they had to revert everyone back to X11. This type of thing cannot be managed by regular users.

    Imagine if you had to understand how 90% of every car part worked in order to drive a car, and if you don’t understand something you ask for help and everyone ridicules you because they are mechanics.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really wish the Linux community would do a better job of separating the software updates from the core operating system and user space apps.

      You can accomplish this with something like Debian stable and Flatpaks. OK, but now you have to explain these concepts to people, too 😆. It works great but it’s not quite user friendly. Ubuntu gets dunked on a lot for Snaps but I think they are actually the one mainstream distro that is trying to make Snaps as transparent for users as possible, thereby achieving the goal of separating the core operating system from user applications. Though I still prefer Flatpaks.

        • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Both are similar, and the very short version is they are sandboxed applications that bundle their own dependencies and can update out of band with your distro’s software repository. With Flatpaks they can share a common runtime environment, but I think with Snaps they bundle everything into the snap (I might be wrong about this).

          One key difference is that Snap is basically only on Ubuntu, and Snaps can also bundle CLI applications or server software. Flatpaks are currently really meant for desktop applications.

          In both cases you can modify the permissions of the the programs they bundle sort of like how you might expect on iOS or Android. That is to say you can restrict their access to the file system, the network, or other things. So, as an example, I can run a proprietary program as a Flatpak but ensure it cannot access my Bluetooth if for some reason I feel that need.

          • andruid@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To expand on why snaps are Ubuntu only is because the back end for snap distribution is proprietary.

      • mhz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is amazing how 3 steps can be challenging for some even though these are explained in flathub (for all major distros) 1- install flatpak which should install a pluging for gui Package manager automatically. 2- add flathub repo. 3- Configure your gui package manager to default to flathub 4- enjoy installing rhe latest software from flathub without even needing root password (except for Opensuse TW)

    • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can save yourself from reinstalling over and over by using an immutable distribution so at any point you will know what changed in your system and if it breaks you can just roll back to the previous working point and either fix your mistake or wait for a fix from upstream when an issue happens there (this year there were a few kinda major hiccups on Fedora for example).
      I suggest you try one of the Fedora immutable spins (Silverblue, Kinoite, Sericea) or Vanilla OS, though I would hold off from it until Orchid comes out.
      If you want to go all in you can use NixOS, but it takes a lot of reading

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll have to try one out just so I understand how they work, but I don’t personally need something like this. I’ve used Gentoo, Fedora, Slackware, Ubuntu/Debian, Arch, and more for years.

        • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, actually I don’t know how I ended up responding to you, I have since deleted that comment, I meant it for the OP.
          Aside from that, when you’re as experienced as you, you generally don’t end up breaking your system anyway, if one really wanted I think the real good thing to do regardless of distro would be using one of the few packaging solutions that are siloed from the rest system

          • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            when you’re as experienced as you, you generally don’t end up breaking your system anyway

            haha, it only that were true :P