New York state will create a commission tasked with considering reparations to address the persistent, harmful effects of slavery in the state, under a bill signed into law by Gov. Kathy Hochul on Tuesday.

It comes at a time when many states and towns throughout the United States attempt to figure out how to best reckon with the country’s dark past, and follows in the footsteps of similar task forces established in California and Illinois.

“In New York, we like to think we’re on the right side of this. Slavery was a product of the South, the Confederacy,” Hochul, a Democrat, said at the bill signing ceremony in New York City. “What is hard to embrace is the fact that our state also flourished from that slavery. It’s not a beautiful story, but indeed it is the truth.”

The law, which was passed by state lawmakers in June, says the commission will examine the institution of slavery, which was fully abolished in New York by 1827, and its ongoing impact on Black New Yorkers today.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    A lot of the old money that built New York, like the Vanderbilts, Goldman, and Lehman families became rich on the backs of slaves. The ancestors of the slave owners inherited that wealth and with it the debt to the ancestors of their slaves.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Those families did things like build parks, libraries, museums, concert halls, and schools that New Yorkers all have benefitted from. If you live in New York (or The US in general), you have benefitted from the spoils of slavery.

        • Drusas@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          As do the descendants of slaves who have those same amenities available.

          That’s not the argument you think it is. Also, my family came over poor on both sides. We weren’t the ones doing the oppressing.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Black people were systematically prevented from benefiting from those amenities for generations (and sometimes still are).

            My family are poor immigrants on both sides too. That doesn’t matter. If you buy a house and later find out that the plumbing is bad, that is your responsibility even though you didn’t create the problem. We inherited this country and with it the obligation to fix the broken parts.

            • Drusas@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I understand what you’re saying but disagree with your ultimate conclusion.

              The average modern-day American did not directly benefit from slavery and many didn’t even come to the country until after slavery had been long since abolished. Some of those people were also treated as ethnic minorities though they may be seen as “white” now. Which is to say, they were terribly disadvantaged in the American economy because they were immigrants or descended from the “wrong” background.

              Any reparations that are to be made should be made by the perpetrators or those who have directly benefited from said perpetrators’ actions. To tax other impoverished lineages in order to provide reparations to another group which had it even worse is unjust.

              I do firmly believe that the country needs to address its systemic issues, but I don’t believe that taxing the majority to give cash to the aggrieved is the solution.