cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally any other type of business

    You’ve just eliminated perhaps the safest, most attainable method for the average person to achieve passive income.

    Owning land for personal use

    Other than living on it, why would someone want to own land?

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’ve just eliminated perhaps the safest, most attainable method for the average person to achieve passive income.

      If the “safest most attainable way” to get wealth requires others to be homeless or unable to afford a basic necessity then it isn’t not worth it.

      And it arguably isn’t the most attainable way, because so many people are being priced out of owning a home because of the current system’s failures.

      Other than living on it, why would someone want to own land?

      To use it for a business or enjoyment. I’m not sure where you are going with this.