cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • SamboT@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But why should it be anything but a personal investment? I’m not seeing your point there. Isn’t it better for everyone to decommodify housing?

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why should it be anything but a personal investment?

      What do mean? I don’t see how what I said negates that.

      Isn’t it better for everyone to decommodify housing?

      Not really no. Commodfication is why things used to be cheap. High [insert item here] prices are directly related to money printing, corporate welfare and regulations that are designed to raise the barrier of entry for normal people.