• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Its not just the word bubbles. Pictures and videos come through on Android like complete shit. I can’t even have my wife send me pictures of the kids cause I can’t see them on the other end. Nor can I watch family videos sent to me. Its much more than simple colors, but of course kids are getting bullied for that.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Now this makes sense, thank you. Garbage quality video and pictures are a so annoying. It seems to ruin an entire group chat if one of them is on an iPhone. I often have to wait until I see someone in person or have them send it through a different app for the video to work.

      I have yet to get a group conversation to switch to Signal or something to avoid the potato quality videos

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Apple could fix this by uploading the photos to iCloud and sending a link. But improving the experience of SMS chats is not profitable, so they instead actively downgrade the experience.

        • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I always send an iCloud link for photos when I know that there’s someone who may not be using an iPhone. I’m not sure why others don’t. It’s especially useful when sending large numbers of pictures.

        • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s what the Verizon messages app does, just with a Verizon website instead of iCloud. I found it very annoying and slow to use.

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yea, this is a USA problem. Elsewhere everyone just uses a messaging app of their network’s choice.

        • Z4rK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not entirely true. In Scandinavia for example, iPhone is the majority market share, on average higher than that of United States.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Tell the wife to use telegram or another messaging client. There are plenty of perfectly good alternatives to imessages.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        We use messenger, which I also don’t like. Its ridiculous. If these fucken tech giants aren’t going to right interoperability standards then someone needs to force them to. We made all this shit to make life better and somehow have forgotten that was the fucken goal.

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          For better or worse you happen to be using the one messaging app that is broadly agreed to be worse than iMessage.

          Signal and Telegram are far superior, even putting aside the most glaring flaws of the other two.

            • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I’ve successfully converted a spouse, which I don’t think is out of the question w.r.t who I replied to.

              I’ve also converted my main friend group, but appreciate that’s insurmountable for a lot of people - genuinely, people hate change after all. I’m lucky to have a lot of friends who work in tech and are receptive to trying new things.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Its convenience. Why have both of us download a new app strictly for pictures when she is already on Facebook, and I have a dusty one with no posts for a decade. Plus getting someone in the US to download a 3rd party messaging app is like asking them to respond to the Nigerian Prince for his offers.

            • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Fair enough. It’s kind of an oxymoron to worry about the trust of a given 3rd party messaging app while using products from a known, wide scale, repeated privacy intruder like Meta, but you have what you need in terms of convenience so I won’t make a further case for an alternative.

              • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Believe me, I know. I wouldn’t be using it if the people I need it for would switch. But people don’t give a shit here. I gave up trying to move apps. The rest of my shit is arch linux and de googled. This is the last hold out.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’d say Telegram isn’t superior. It’s default encryption is nowhere near iMessage.

            And if you step up the encryption, you lose group chats.

            For it’s flaws, iMessage is a very good solution, one that Signal was emulating for a while.

            • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not criticising the UX of iMessage for Apple to Apple comms. It’s solid, and was leader-in-class for a very long time.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Why should they be forced to interop? That’ll just reduce it to the lowest commend denominator. What impetus would any of them have for investing in making a better system if everyone can use their work?

          We have choices. We don’t have to use iMessage, or Beeper. We can use other messengers.

          Forcing interop means all messengers will function the same… Again at the LCD level.

          Plus different messengers have different capabilities, different use-cases.

          Frankly I don’t even want to use SMS at all, and haven’t wanted to for 10 years. I want a messenger that’s independent of my mobile device that I can simply sign into just about anywhere. Kind of like instant messengers were in the late 90’s (which often used things like XMPP).

          Ten+ years ago I was running instant messengers on Android. Pidgin, Trillian, etc, logging in to multiple messengers. That should’ve been the path forward, but people couldn’t be bothered because SMS was free, native, and “good enough” (in their minds).

          And yet back then any conversations I had on any device showed up on all devices. With no dependence on my SIM or phone hardware ID.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            interoperability is the capability of a product or system to interact and function with others. Why would that force them to all function the same? Why would that be bad for us as consumers? Why does it matter how many choices we have if those choices restrict us to using a specific one? Interoperability solves all of these and causes none of the problems you are stating. Of course they have no incentive for doing this as it doesn’t benefit a corporation, they’re only incentivized to entrap people in their ecosystems cause it makes them the most money. Different messaging standards is one of the ways they keep us locked in. This is a choice, too, one made by the tech giants for you with no choice in the matter. You can’t send a nice quality picture from iMessage to Google Messages, get fukt.

            • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              How else do you make them interop, other than by finding a common mapping?

              Why would any company map their extended or unique elements, which they developed, to meet government regs?

              They won’t, they’ll drop to the least effort required to get the regulators off their backs.

              I have a choice. Apple users have a choice. There are plenty of other messenging systems out there.

              MS Teams

              Skype

              Element

              SimpleX

              Signal

              Telegram

              Wire

              Wiremin

              Litewire

              Discord

              Conversations

              Snikket

              Briar

              Zello

              TwinMe

              Tox

              Keybase

              Threema

              Whatsapp

              Jami

              XMPP (which some listed use)

              Just go to Wikipedia for a long list of different messengers and their capabilities.

              • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Choice is nice, but my problem is the choices can’t communicate with each other correctly. Thats an issue. Its an issue when our communication devices are not effective at communicating what we want to. We are already seeing the bare ass minimum right now, which is just SMS. They’re doing that now, the bare minimum. If Apple was forced to fix their shitty conversion instead of it just picking the worst resolution possible, they would do it. It doesn’t matter what app I use because most people in the US use iMessage, and thats where I do most of my communicating.

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I prefer Signal to telegram and it’s been amazing the whole time I’ve used it

        Now if I could just convince more people I know to switch to it that’d be great

      • Fly4aShyGuy@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s certainly less desirable option for many. But why is wanting modern cross platform messaging so bad? It works iPhone to iPhone, works Android to Android, theoretically if there were other players (maybe if BB or Windows still had phones) they could also achieve the same using RCS with Android. This argument is and has always been about default protocols that phone can communicate with. Of course downloading 3rd party chat apps, emailing them, mailing them a letter, using a cup and string, stopping communication because they chose to use a phone from a different manufacture are all still “options”.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That doesn’t solve the interoperability problem. You can’t guarantee who has what messaging app. You shouldn’t need a 3rd party app for basic functionality, anyway.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I like Signal better than my standard android SMS app. I can send more pictures at a time, video at high quality, and it does groups well.