Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前Judge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down16
arrow-up1190arrow-down1external-linkJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前message-square58linkfedilink
minus-squarebob_omb_battlefield@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 天前Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
minus-squareNomad Scry@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 天前Absolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 天前Yes precisely. I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid. We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank. I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.
Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
Absolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
Yes precisely.
I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid.
We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank.
I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.