Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel’s right to defend itself.

“Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to “remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.”

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I believe ALL of the following;

    • Iran should not have nuclear weapons
    • Israel should not have nuclear weapons
    • Iran should not weaponize Palestinian suffering or coax them into attacking Israel while Iran itself sees little repercussions
    • Israel should not genocide
    • Israel has committed genocide and should pay a hefty price
    • Neither Iran nor Israel will really answer for their fuckery
    • Palestinians will remain fucked…if they survive.

    My heart breaks for the Palestinian people who suffer and die for others’ greed, ambition, and political squabbles.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly. This is not a competition, we don’t have to cheer for either side. Horrible things are happening

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d add:

      • Hamas needs to deleted from the face of earth

      And all that basically describes the opinion of 90% of the population just that vocal minorities are very vocal.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.mlBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        90 percent of the western population. The rest of the world is more sympathetic to the militant struggle against imperial genocide.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is the nature of modern day proxy conflicts. Both actors can continue easily but the “battlefield” like Gaza and South Lebanon are the ones that lose.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.mlBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well that’s a nice enough list in a vacuum, but what does that actually mean she the real world? Israel already has nukes, Iran won’t survive without them, Palestinians are going to fight back against the fascists trying to exterminate them - with or without Irans prompting - and sympathetic countries like Iran are going to try and aid that struggle.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I agree with all of your past tense takes. The future remains to be determined. We might all be flattened at this rate.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Iran is two weeks away from nuclear capability” - Netanyahu: 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, 2025

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    How else can the most advanced first-world nations keep exploiting the Middleeast?

    With Netynyahu, we can change the government of any nation in the middleast. We just tell him to make a presentation that they’re bad and have big weapons!

    Guys please understand we, the US, UK, Germany, and rest of G7 first-world nations, reaally need to assassinate forign leaders and destory and kill the people of any nation that opposes the existance of a genocidal ethnostate aparthied … because, the few Zionists who pay our salaries will not have a country where they can kill, evict, colonize, assassinate anyone who is not from their chosen race. Then we will have to give these brown people democracy, and their own governments?!!

    If we did not make the middleast into dictatorships that work with our genocidal ethostate only, then they will not sell us cheap oil and will not have to couple all their trades, currencies and inflations against US dollar. Omg. imagine if they were then allowed to manufacture their own weapons and not buy trillions worth of military equipments and defense contracts from us? omg… our 9999 military bases there? who will pay for them?

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah but until countries like the US, Russia, China and the rest give them up, they are the only true guarantee of sovereignty.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Even the statement is not about protecting people lives but about market stability.

    They are not working for the people…

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    5 days ago

    China, India, and Pakistan once again proving that having nukes does actually matter because you can’t be arbitrarily shoved around around by the only other nuclear powers.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      it also helps if your air defense network doesn’t collapse immediately because it turns out that in order to guard these nukes you need also regular capable conventional military

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Iran already has the information needed to make nuclear weapons; the Trump administration’s DOGE leaked that information

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Of course they do … you can basically find that information on the internet.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        https://www.nytimes.com/1976/10/09/archives/student-designs-2000-atom-bomb.html

        University physics student designed an atomic bomb to prove that nearly anyone with information now publicly available could do the same thing.

        The student, John A. Phillips, a 21‐year‐old senior, using information obtained from unclassified sources, has prepared a 34‐page report said to contain plans for a crude plutonium device weighing 125 pounds and allegedly carrying a charge one‐third as powerful as the one detonated over Hiroshima in World War II.

        “The point was to show,” he said, “that any undergraduate with a physics background can do it, and therefore that it is reasonable to assume that terrorists could do it, too.”

        Mr. Phillips, who took four months for research and to complete his plans, did not build his bomb, and scientists familiar with his work have refused to evaluate the plans.

        But the New Haven student, whose father is a professor of mechanical engineering at Yale, contends that his academic advisers have assured him that the device is “workable.”

        By the time Mr. Phillips completed his plans, he had concluded that “billions of dollars and years of research are no longer required for the design and construction of a fission bomb,” but that “fanatical dedication to the goal and scientific know‐how are.”

        Mr. Phillips said yesterday while outlining his plans for the bomb, which he contends could be built for $2,000, that he could have designed a more extensive one but that he had limited himself “to the crudest, cheapest and simplest device.”

        “Any other physics major could do this better,” Mr. Phillips asserted. “It was just luck that I got on the right track. I’m really one of the poorest students in the physics department.”

        While i am sure his comments on it costing $2,000 ($11,300 today) are broadly exaggerating, the key point remains. The information needed is really not the obstacle in the process of acquiring a nuclear bomb.

  • gobbles_turkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well Pakistan will give them one if needed so they kind of already have one. Maybe stop pushing them to use it on Israel.

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m just surprised squeaky tank birthday pissboy didn’t elbow his way to the center of this photo like he used to do during his first term. He must be tired from being old as fuck.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ukraine had nukes and gave them up. They were invaded.

    Iraq gave up their WMD program after the first Gulf War. They were invaded again.

    Iran definitely had a nuclear program, but doesn’t appear to be pursuing it anymore. They’re getting attacked and quite possibly will get invaded.

    South Africa had a nuclear program and gave it up. Left alone.

    The Great Powers, particularly the United States but also Russia, have shown that your country should just keep going once you start. Chances are, you’ll get invaded, anyway.

    This is not the way towards anti-proliferation.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sweden stopped its nuclear program.

      But joined NATO which (in theory) is like having nukes.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hell, even if you don’t. Gaddafi made a big show of “giving up” weapons that he didn’t even really have, and he still got raped to death with a bayonet.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      South Africa had a nuclear program and gave it up. Left alone.

      How do nukes help South Africa? They don’t have rockets. What do they threaten to bomb that is a deterrent?

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

    The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel’s right to defend itself.

    I never had much hope, but come the fuck on. Statements like these unironically make me want to cheer for the fascists.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Looks like Israel-US are the principal source for instability in the area, to me.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      you don’t have to choose a side and you can wish everyone involved a very nice visit to hague

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I do wish everyone involved a very nice visit to the Hague, but more than that if Westerners can’t stop their leaders from stanning for genocide, then it becomes very tempting to choose the fascists who will sabotage the Zionist project by running their countries to the ground. I’m a firm believer that people who support genocide don’t deserve anything but fascism.