• mvilain@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m perfectly fine switching back to a “feature phone” aka dump phone that takes phone calls and sends texts. If it also could be used as a music/podcast playiner, that’d be great too.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m just making commentary bud. Multiple times in the city I’ve seen people nearly get hit by busses because they cross the street nose deep in their phone without looking up. Some people can’t come unglued for 10 seconds to look both ways before crossing a busy roadway in a bus plaza, it’s kind of crazy!

  • Goretantath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    If you ban smartphones you better make a better replacement portable pc in the palm of my hand then.

  • Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is literally not a problem with smartphones, the problem is about the software you decide to run on it. A smartphone is simply a very powerful pocket computer.

    • Thinker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I agree, except that we are legally not allowed to control the software on our phones in lots of cases. Notifications, ads, upgrades, etc. are all controlled by the manufacturer and it’s illegal to override their software on the device you own.

      Add to that that specific pieces of software are becoming increasingly necessary to function in society, and you start to see that it’s not really a matter of individual choice, anymore than people shopping at walmart can be blamed for buying processed, sugary foods when that’s 90% of what walmart stocks (And all they promote), and walmart is the only affordable option in their community.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve been able to turn off notifications for anything on my phone. Only the few apps I choose to allow still give me notifications.

        I am fortunate to have a job that does not require a cell phone, I can leave it behind for hours at a time without affecting my work. I know this is not the case for everyone, but it should be an option.

        At the very least, a phone required for work should have a separate phone number and email account, and should turn off automatically after the employee clocks out for the day. Some countries already have laws about this stuff, we should do that more.

      • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Do it anyway. I use adb to modify my phone and make it suck less. I also look forward to the day (if it ever comes) where Linux phones are a viable replacement option.

  • Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Smartphones make us more social, allowing us to reach each other ad hoc, not just by planning the meeting for a week. They makes us more free by providing helping tools like GPS and similar. They make us happier by helping to kill time while standing in the line or riding on the bus.

    You’re doing something wrong.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            So you used to hang out with your friends and share articles and comment on them in person then upvote/downvote and moderate? ok sure whatever you say…

      • Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        And what does it have to do with smartphones? You think that “social media” is “antisocial”? Well, then write it as “ban social media”. Be precise with formulations.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          And what does it have to do with smartphones?

          You said they make us “more social”. I said they don’t.

          You think that “social media” is “antisocial”? Well, then write it as “ban social media”

          Also acceptable.

      • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not all social media. But we know what you are talking about. The clout culture and instant gratification is what ruining them.

        Banning one would only create thousands of copycats. And don’t think they won’t come here, if Lemmy, Mastodon or Pixelfed gets popular.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ehhhh no.

    I can get behind “ban spying on me.”

    I can even get behind “ban social media, especially the kind that makes you sell yourself, though pseudononymous link aggregators are less the issue.”

    But “no more torrenting at work, no more reading digitally while pooping, no more encrypted chats, now have to carry a book, a camera, an mp3 player, my GBC, and a dumb phone, just to make up for the phone?”

    No.

  • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hey David, can you guess how many people are reading your article from a smartphone? Convenient, isn’t it.

    Want to complain about smartphones? Write a book… or something that can be published on fucking paper.

      • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        So, can you guess which percentage of people prefer using an smartphone to read these kind of anti smartphone articles? Do you see the issue? The irony?

        This is just trash ragebait dude.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      You mean it’s not the genocide, exploitation, imperialism, etc? It’s just social media? Peak capitalist apologism.

      • scintilla@lemmy.blahaj.zoneBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        You understand that social media helps create and reinforce those things right? Social media has lead to the fall of America into fascism. It might have if social media didn’t exist but this rise in fascism is directly related to social media and the way that it fucks with peoles heads.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      But people clicked it, and it’s the only thing that matters. Of course banning smartphones completely is a stupid idea, but it’s a wild claim that draws attention.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    smartphones are one of rhe hundreds o things that would probably be just fine and good if it weren’t for capitalism

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    And then what? Go back to the stone age?

    Kids waiting to get picked at school and their parents have emergency, how are they gonna inform the others to get picked up? Are they gonna just let that kid suck it up and wait for hours, just like the good old times?

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Idk why don’t you go directly to the site?

      https://jacobin.com/

      Looks fine to me but they’re preaching to the choir. You’re certainly right that people have only been posting their shit takes here.

      Like some kind of engagement or rage bait or something