uncapybarable@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1131arrow-down1external-linkRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.comuncapybarable@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarereddit_sux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year ago Stable is freaking old and unstable. I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.
minus-squareGilberto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.
minus-squareSir Aramis@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoPretty sure the whole statement is Stable is freaking old, and unstable has lots of limitations I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.
minus-squarewarmaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoExactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.
minus-squareJuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoA lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.
I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.
I think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.
Pretty sure the whole statement is
I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.
Exactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.
A lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.