Toes♀@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoGlitch in the matrixani.socialimagemessage-square571fedilinkarrow-up1420arrow-down10
arrow-up1420arrow-down1imageGlitch in the matrixani.socialToes♀@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square571fedilink
minus-squareCheesyFox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoa fair point, but aren’t division and subtraction are non-communicative, hence both operands need to be evaluated first?
minus-squareEffortlessEffluvium@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoIt’s commutative, not communicative, btw
minus-squarePipoca@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year ago1 - 3 + 1 is interpreted as (1 - 3) + 1 = -1 Yes, they’re non commutative, and you need to evaluate anything in parens first, but that’s basically a red herring here.
a fair point, but aren’t division and subtraction are non-communicative, hence both operands need to be evaluated first?
It’s commutative, not communicative, btw
whoops, my bad
1 - 3 + 1 is interpreted as (1 - 3) + 1 = -1
Yes, they’re non commutative, and you need to evaluate anything in parens first, but that’s basically a red herring here.
ok, i guess you’re right