• Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    In my experience, “writing a proof in math” was an exercise in rote memorization. They didn’t try to teach us how any of it worked, just “Write this down. You will have to write it down just like this on the test.” Might as well have been a recipe for custard.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      That sounds like a problem in the actual course.

      One of my course exams in first year Physics involved mathematically deriving a well known theorem (forgot which, it was decades ago) from other theorems and they definitelly hadn’t taught us that derivation - the only real help you got was that they told you where you could start from.

      Mind you, in different courses I’ve had that experience of one being expected to do rote memorization of mathematical proofs in order to be able to regurgitate them on the exam.

      Anyways, the point I’m making is that your experience was just being unlucky with the quality of the professors you got and the style of teaching they favored.

      • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Calculus was literally invented to describe physics. If you learn physics without learning basic derivative calculus along side it you’re only getting a part of the picture, so I’m guessing you derived something like y position in a 2 dimensional projectile motion problem cause that’s a fuckin classic. Sounds like you had a good physics teacher 👍

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If I remember it correctly it was something about electromagnetism and you started from the rules for Black Body radiation.

          It was University level Physics, so projectile motion in 2D without taking in account attrition would have made for an exceedingly simple exam question 🙃

          • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Haha fair enough I guess I took first year to mean high school level physics but I took calculus in high school so that made sense to me.