• AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is your egg too expensive?
    Look no further. Our egg is much smoother and can be worn with most garments.

    EggEgg. For your egg.

  • MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Aside from 🏴‍☠️ there are simply too many legitimate pay streaming options in 2025 for Netflix to think they can do this. This will end like an arrogant urban cowboy being flung off a mechanical bull and I’m all for it.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      But you’re only getting ads if you choose to get them. What’s your problem exactly?

    • gradual@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Always sad watching people complain about ads on free streaming sites which can be easily blocked with an adblocker while defending their subscription to netflix.

      It really puts into perspective how ‘intelligent’ the average consumer is and how seriously their input should be taken, though.

      • bean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        They said if they PAY to use… and get ads. They are right, I ditched tv for streaming because less ads. Now they want to go full circle? I feel like I can’t even open up the fridge these days without having some agenda or ad start.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Huh?? If a streaming site (or any product for that matter) is free, the user is the product - be it their time, personal info, whatever. It is known and accepted that a “free” service will have a catch that allows the provider to make money.

        If a user PAYS for a service it is expected that the payment is enough remuneration for there to be no strings attached. Of course companies will look for shitty ways to do shitty things to make more money, and those companies ought to be punished, generally by a reduction in customers, for their shitty behaviour.

        • gradual@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If a streaming site (or any product for that matter) is free, the user is the product

          Not necessarily. This is rhetoric peddled by useful idiots to justify spending money on things they could be getting for free.

          Companies have a way easier time harvesting and selling your data when you give them your credit card info.

          But good job defending corporate abuse with a “saying.” You’re not a useful idiot.

        • mriswith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          As the old saying goes: Don’t feed the trolls.

          Replying as if half the comment doesn’t exist and putting the word intelligent in quotes is a classic antagonizing move by trolls to make people try to engage them.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hate to see it but… it makes sense.

    It’s wrong, sure, in many ways (privacy, ecology, ethically depending on the dataset) but if there is 1 application where generative AI ads would make sense is through a personalized stream. So… yes it’s bad, consumers might reject it, but it’s not the actually dumbest way to use a terrible technology.

    To be clear, again, I 100% hate it but if I was a greedy Netflix stakeholder I’d think “Hmmm yes, maybe!”.

  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why would I care. If they think it’s profitable, I have no arguments against it. I’m not paying attention to the ads anyways.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      That absolutely won’t happen.

      Everybody on Lemmy and Reddit were saying the same when they banned account sharing and price increases. In reality their subscriber numbers went through the roof and so did their profits.

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sadly I think you’re a optimistic with those numbers. It’s probably gonna be a few thousand. The numbers can feel skewed if you only look at Lemmy.

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think it’ll be somewhere in the middle. Quite a few people have not had to deal with ads in streaming for many years now, if it’s suddenly forced it’ll piss off a lot

        I don’t think they’re all going to suddenly pirate again, I think many will just switch to other streaming providers.

        If they all start doing the shitty ads, we’re fucked.

        • KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          People might be forced to stop paying for these services, at least at their current prices. The recession might force the needed step back from consumerism. If the average person has 4 streaming services, and tightens their bet to “just” 1, that’s a 3/4ths reduction in subscribers across the industry.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, my cousins are normies. Every time I’m at their place and the TV is on, you almost can’t tell if the ads get more play than the content they actually wanted to see. Their TV is treated like an old FM radio where ads are just a part of it. They complain, but they’ll never actually do anything about it.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hey Netflix, the amount of people are willing to endure for a paid subscription is ZERO and it will always remain so. In fact even the stupid games advertised on the top of the landing page made me use Netflix less and less, and now that they stopped password sharing I don’t use it at all

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They show me an ad, and they are out. It is that simple. Luckily, my life does not depend on streaming.

    • froh42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Haha, already there. I canceled my Netflix a year ago or so after the amount of cheap self produced stuff got too much and they removed more and more older quality content.

      Now, whenever I want to stream I sign up for a single streaming service for a month or two - but the time where I was just subscribed all the time is over.

      Ah one reason also was the sharing crackdown, I had kept the subscription long term as my kids used it when they were at my place or my ex-wife’s. Nowadays it doesn’t work anymore as (for example) the TV my son has at the ex-wife’s place never is connected via my internet.

      With added commercials, less quality etc streaming got less attractive. Hey, nowadays I regularly go to movie theaters, again.

      And if things get worse, somewhere I still have my captain’s hat and the wooden leg for sailing the seven seas…

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m kinda proud of myself, that I skipped Netflix and never took off my pirate hat.

      • D_C@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I never took off my pirates hat but I have had a netflix account for about a year…

        It wasn’t my account. One of my kids friends signed in to their profile on my TV so I used it every now and again until the password sharing option was taken away.