• devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    It needs to get even nastier so that it affects all the big players in a huge way so they get to do something about it. While it only affects the indie web we are all just gonna keep suffering.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    The web doesn’t have a business model, cloudflair, you do. And nobody cares because you suck.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Eh, Cloudflare provides a pretty good service for a very reasonable price.

      But yeah, the web doesn’t have a business model in the same way a town square doesn’t, yet you can make a business work in both areas. Make a compelling product and people will pay you for it.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        You mean product that literally makes web unusable for many and tracks your every single step with extremely invasive fingerprinting techniques? That product?

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’d say that getting your server DDoSed makes it a whoooole lot less usable.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          That’s a big reason why I don’t use their security layer, mostly just their domain registrar. They have a ton of products that don’t involve tracking your users.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Cloudflare provides a pretty good service for a very reasonable price.

        You mean selling fingerprinted user data to advertisers?

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah I think we’re going to be grappling with this issue for at least the next decade. The traditional web model falls apart under AI

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      To be fair, the traditional web models were falling apart prior to AI as well. We’ve gone so far past “ad driven” that Everything has to be full of ads and clickbait to drive revenue just to run the infrastructure, let alone pay for the pages creation and upkeep. Journalists and developers, services and goods are all using adword soup to try to get anything close to a useful revenue stream and it’ll just keep getting worse until we figure out a better business model. We’re going to increasingly see paywalls to try to make up for that, but a large part of people on the internet won’t want to spend money on quality sources when they use to be able to get it for free. It’s been a race to the bottom for a while and it’s at a point that isn’t sustainable long term. AI just accelerates that to the next level.

      • feannag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        What’s challenging about paywalls and not wanting to spend money is not necessarily not wanting to spend, but convenience and cost. If it costs me 10 cents for each blog or tutorial or github page I look at while working on a project, or 1 cent for every funny video, that adds up. And do I have to put my credit card in for every site? Hope that every site has good enough security to prevent payment information leaks?

        And I don’t think anyone is interested in a Netflix-style internet that fractures into 6 different subscriptions to get every site you need on the web.

        • morrowind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Some sort of universal microtransaction layer is the dream. I believe there’s also a proposed web standard for it.

          Scroll was also making it work before they got bought by Twitter

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      The traditional web was long gone anyways. There are like a dozent sites you find for any Google query. It’s so hard to find small hidden treasure on the internet.

    • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Uhh, dude. Haven’t you heard that Siri is basically useless?

      Maybe that’s why she just typed this post instead of inserting the meme.

  • NSRXN@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    nobody is going to want to create new content when they get paid nothing or almost nothing for doing so.

    that’s a lie

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    i like to publish content so that bots can scrape it and serve it to people without attribution i think it’s good i think ill publish some more interesting stuff right away

  • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    maybe their business model. trust me. they’ll find a way to monetize the zero click internet too. then it’s back to square one

    • e461h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      I believe this is why tech execs and investors are so hot on pushing AI into everything. They’ll control everyone’s digital experience and you can 100% count on being force fed ads and paid propaganda. Embrace, extend, extinguish

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, so much for all those promises of disintermediation being a benefit of the web.

      • gradual@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yep. They have direct control over the flow of information.

        Honestly, Metal Gear Solid 2 was on fucking point.

        And so was 4.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I tried playing 2 again recently because I had the same thought, and I had to stop because my wife would not stop laughing at Rose’s dialogue. God, I wish Kojima had ever met a woman.

          • okmko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            And she’s 100% justified. The older you get the more appearant it becomes that he’s bad at writing dialogue and story. He’s a tendency of using controvencies to create drama and it often falls flat, if not into eye-roll territory.

            I could not stop cringing during Death Stranding. I had to fast forward the ending. I imagine Margaret Qualley being completely bewildered when they were capturing her character’s twin soul melding scene.

            • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I don’t necessarily think he’s bad at writing dialogue and story, I think he’s mostly just bad at writing women. As I’ve gotten older, I went from taking Metal Gear Solid super seriously to treating it like nuclear/techno Evil Dead

              • okmko@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Yeah, we’re just less experienced and have fewer expectations when we’re young. We were much more impressionable then.

                Guys in general are bad at portraying women, as I understand. That’s on top of being bad in general for Kojima, I think. There’s a funny interview with the MGS2 English translator Agness Kaku where she comments that the writing at times is high school fanfic level.

          • gradual@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            What parts of Rose’s dialogue made her laugh so much?

            I could tell that it was commentary on the lonely and reserved lives that was stereotypical of gamers in the early to mid 2000s. So much of that game was meant to be directed towards the player, I wonder if it fell on deaf ears for her because she’s not really the target audience.

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 days ago

    Letting Google break the law for years with illegal anti-competitive practices is now hurting everyone else’s ability to earn money.

    I wonder if we have the combined will to do anything about it, or if we will wait and hope the invisible hand of the market will fix it…

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      if we will wait and hope the invisible hand of the market will fix it…

      Have we lost faith in our handsome businessman? /s

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can someone check in with the inventor of the web and ask him what the web’s business model is?

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    5 days ago

    Don’t take this the wrong way, but fuck your business model. The internet was supposed to be open and be ours, and you stole it for profit.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be honest: you can still make your own website, and in many ways big companies are actually making it easier through open-source projects and stuff like Let’s Encrypt. The web industry is remarkably open compared to what big companies do in other industries. A lot of the standards meetings and stuff you can just go to and give your opinion. Or ignore the standards and fork it yourself. This alarmism I fear will make people not take the actually alarming things like encryption bans or ID requirements seriously.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Only for some things, though. If you host your own e-mail these days, chances are, you’re going to have a very difficult time sending them anywhere without risking them being deleted, or automatically thrown into spam folders.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m not buying whatever a billionaire nepo baby CEO monopoly owner is pedaling. Let’s hear what some labor leaders have to say about it for a change.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      i’d like to be a labor leader, but i’m not (yet). Yet here’s my opinion:

      Knowledge was meant to be free since the beginning. I look at ideas as human-cultivated, carefully cultured viruses. They’re packages of information that live within a host.

      They’re a lot less aggressive than their feral counterparts, but they’re still individual beings who want to spread. Holding back knowledge is unnatural, and the internet should be free.

      • gradual@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, the odds are really stacked against businesses when it comes to sharing information.

        The fact they’ve been able to keep such a stranglehold on it for so long is really a testament to how much excess power they have over our societies.

        Future generations are laughing at us, and rightfully so.