• Termight@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where is the harm?

      Snowden’s disclosures, while aiming for transparency, risked national security, compromised sources, strained relations, & potentially enabled misuse of info. Buddhist principles emphasize avoiding harm & maintaining order, aspects potentially impacted by his actions. A balanced view acknowledges both benefit & risk.

      • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maintaining order in this context would mean letting some people harm other people’s privacy though.

        • Termight@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maintaining order in this context would mean letting some people harm other people’s privacy though.

          You’re right to question “order” at the expense of privacy. Buddhist principles highlight interdependence & ethical action. Security shouldn’t erode fundamental rights. Privacy & security are interconnected, not opposing forces.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          termights replies to you make me agree with your original statement. any harm was to things that are themselves overall harmful. Now that I look at it, it feels like between what we saw with snowden and schwartz it was 2013 when I really realized things are really really messed up.

    • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Exposing truth can often get people killed, especially if the liars are in the government, want to kill witnesses or rats, or at least make their lives hell for betraying the state. Depending on the severity, livelihoods are often at stake. That’s why very few people engage in whistleblowing. They’re aware that it will not get better for them.