• Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    The usefulness of tanks in warfare is coming to an end, this thing will get taken out by a $2000 to $3000 drone.

    They will still keep making them to sell to police.

    • Geobloke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      A big gun and survivability will always have a place on the battlefield. Until there is something else that can do what tanks can better, they will still be here

    • TheMightyCat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      The same was said when the ATGM was invented. Yet the tank survived all the same.

      And with APS becoming more and more common i predict we will continue to see tanks on the battlefield.

      • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        It doesn’t only go back to ATGMs, people have been making the claim that tanks are obsolete since tanks were first fielded in combat.

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, APS can be a gun firing system or just a bunch of small fpv drones. The only real limit is safety restrictions, because a drone that is targeted to kill anything moving at it is going to have a good chance of hitting birds and people. That’s something you could use in Ukraine if you have no civilians and your group is moving only in vehicles.

        • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Automated target acquisition in that regard is prohibitively costly and therefore unlikely to be an option in that totally hypothetical anti-cop/acab situation, to be fair.

          Whereas, consumer-tier FPV drones are not only super affordable, but they’re only getting cheaper to produce (see: FDM printing) and in starling^1 quantities, too. (Hell, I got into the printing hobby initially to offset the cost of learning how to pilot a few myself years ago [ie. lots of crashes. lots.], and the tech has grown immensely since then.)

          Just spitballin’ here, ofc. 😅

          edit: I’m leaving that misspelling ^1 as it seems both poetic & fitting, given the causational global proliferation of said bird by a hapless Shakespeare fan who only wanted to recreate the bard’s local habitat to inspire himself by. I’d like to think that ol 'Bill himself’d take on wannabe-oppressors & sub-basement bigot babies all cosplaying as paramilitary heroes (“tacticool”), ya know?