• BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t disagree that’s a problem, but that is not what I said or implied. That’s the reason Steam has other mechanisms for scoring and scaling reviews. There are plenty of valid reasons for “review bombing” that are organic and natural consequences of developer activity: like adding Denuvo a year after release, adding a launxher or login/account requirement after the fact, etc. Making reviews “invite only” is anti-consumer.

    • Rose@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      If we dig just a bit deeper, it seems your issue is with the whole concept of not owning games, which is the very nature of Steam and its main policy, aptly called the subscriber agreement. Taking that out on game developers, let alone a competitor with more lax DRM practices, is also missing the forest for the trees.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That is absolutely an issue I have, but it’s a whole separate can of worms. One I could talk about all day. Right now I’m just comparing Epics meaningless, useless review system against Steam.