cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1491937

Using surveys, cognitive tests and brain imaging, researchers have identified a type of depression that affects about a quarter of patients. The goal is to diagnose and treat the condition more precisely.

  • Leafeytea@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would be curious to know more about the age of the participants in the sample and if they cross assessed for other cognitive issues before this study began. 1000 people is statistically pretty small, and there can be many other factors contributing to depressive presentation, particularly if there is cognitive decline already occurring due to issues such as MCI or an (as yet) non-diagnosed dementia of some type. Major depression is commonly present in patients with brain illness, which can further complicate and delay correct treatment and diagnosis for both conditions.

    • Velonie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      1000 is not small at all and with a properly designed study it’s more than enough for statistical significance

      • Leafeytea@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was thinking of the sample in relation to the population being studied. There are reportedly over 21 million people in the US diagnosed with depression. 1000 people is representative of less than 0.005% of that group.

        • Velonie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, I’m aware. Sample sizes to get a 95% confidence interval are significantly smaller in most cases than the average person thinks. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination and the section on required sample size for hypotheses tests. There’s even sample size calculators online you can find that’ll spit this number for a 95% CI out for you. Personally I think given that information, it’s pretty unlikely the author made that error in a peer reviewed paper where reviewers are certainly aware as well

          • Umbrias@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just wait until people hear about all the medical studies with sample size goals of twelve, considered an adequate sample size for medical procedure studies and medical device studies.

          • Leafeytea@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks. :) My curiosity about the other factors remains. Perhaps they will add more information about this next time.

            • Velonie@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, that’s totally fair to question. I mentioned above, but it depends on sample selection and study design moreso than the actual number 👍