Transcript
A threads post saying “There has never been another nation ever that has existed much beyond 250 years. Not a single one. America’s 250th year is 2025. The next 4 years are gonna be pretty interesting considering everything that’s already been said.” It has a reply saying “My local pub is older than your country”.
Social science. Nothing written there is accepted as facts.
There’s plenty of areas in this world where multi cultural people live with eachother and view eachother of the same nationality.
USA is probably the best example of this, because it lacks an original culture.
But I gotta admit, it’s difficult to convince lots of diaspora that they are Belgian even though they are fucking born here lol
you commented like you didn’t read half of my comment, again “nation” is construct if you keep using as term “race” it will keep confusing too. humans understands on naming on classification if you always act relative or mix terms all around we cant have a conversation, i am not saying accept my “terms” but we need to have a base or fundamental to speak or understand each other
What do you want to talk about? We don’t need terms. Get rid of the terms. What in society is bothering you.
Terms are unnecessary. Use synonyms, use whatever. Explain it fluently as if I’m a quite young person. Like I would explain accountancy to you while trying to avoid the situation of you telling me that I’m talking Chinese to you.
The only base we need, is that in social science, you cannot take authority. There are no facts. One group of people can act completely different than another group of people, even though everything is exactly the same beside the people themselves. Their personalities will alter quite a lot already.
So let’s talk about what you want to talk about.
ok.
Uhu