• voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Encryption is just locks and since locks can be opened it must be assumed they will be. For sensitive data, destruction is the only option.

      But yes, also encrypt your darn data.

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That is assuming anyone still gives two hoots about your data by the time that lock can be cracked by anything that’s not a supercomputer

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Your encryption might take the age of the universe to break with current computing hardware, but we wouldn’t be having this conversation if vacuum tubes were still a thing. 1024-bit DKIM used to be the gold standard, now it’s unusably weak and 2048-bit is king, due to advances in computing hardware.

          Are you really going to bet we don’t make faster computers in the next 20 years? Or that you’ll be aware an adversary can break your encryption the instant they have the capability?

          • Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Modern solutions for modern problems, ie, update as needed (and algorithms potentially invented)

            Alternatively hide it under the floorboards, with a nail over it and a hammer nearby as needed

            • voracitude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Uh-huh. Scenario: you’re breached and your encrypted data is exfiltrated. Please describe the update process for the encryption of the copy the attackers now hold.

              • Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                I was by no means saying this is an ‘after breach’ scenario. Modern solutions don’t save you retroactively, that wasn’t the point.

                • voracitude@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  And the point of my original comment is that encryption alone will not save you; please go read the thread from the start. All I’ve been saying is that sometimes destroying the data before an imminent breach, like this tool does, is the only way to be sure you haven’t been breached. The person I responded to clearly thinks encryption would be enough and this tool is unnecessary even in the event of a breach, as does every response after, including yours, and that is simply untrue. Encrypt, and consider using this tool or one like it. Like you said, hammer + nail (though that isn’t a guarantee 😋).

          • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            In a billion years I’m probably irrelevant. But is the data on my system right still relevant to anyone even in just 20 years time? I doubt it. No passwords or tokens will be valid anymore. Worst case they see some family photos or old browser history