How would I have used AI here, it’s mostly quotes from the article? You’re way off anyway, it actually took me a little while to try out different ways of formatting that list in Lemmy and making the hyperlinks in the quotes display correctly, let alone finding this in the first place as it was the source of the graph I had seen somewhere that I was thinking initially of posting, or reading the thing in order to pick out appropriate passages. To be clear, I have put way too much effort into writing internet comments over the years to be using LLMs for that now and I promise you I do not do that.
It’s super interesting that a nicely formatted, bulleted and quoted comment like yours was immediately accused of being Ai. I know that AI generally use a similar format when summarizing, but that’s just because it’s been trained on lots of people writing real summaries.
I’m worried that the new keyboard warriors of the internet are just going to be harassing people with AI accusations. I’ve seen gamedevs accused of having their store page text written by AI, artists who’ve had incredible and personal works doubted, and authors having organized harassment campaigns over false Ai suspicions. People are getting really overzealous about being anti AI and it’s getting a bit irrational.
I think maybe the confusion has to do with how that list at the bottom is meant to be another quote rather than a summary, but since it is a code block that looks different from the other quotes that might imply that it isn’t a quote. Now that I’m looking at things more, in hindsight I should have done it like this:
list1
list2
I just didn’t realize it mattered much and figured it cluttered the page less the first way
You are so incredibly lazy using AI for this lol
How would I have used AI here, it’s mostly quotes from the article? You’re way off anyway, it actually took me a little while to try out different ways of formatting that list in Lemmy and making the hyperlinks in the quotes display correctly, let alone finding this in the first place as it was the source of the graph I had seen somewhere that I was thinking initially of posting, or reading the thing in order to pick out appropriate passages. To be clear, I have put way too much effort into writing internet comments over the years to be using LLMs for that now and I promise you I do not do that.
It’s super interesting that a nicely formatted, bulleted and quoted comment like yours was immediately accused of being Ai. I know that AI generally use a similar format when summarizing, but that’s just because it’s been trained on lots of people writing real summaries.
I’m worried that the new keyboard warriors of the internet are just going to be harassing people with AI accusations. I’ve seen gamedevs accused of having their store page text written by AI, artists who’ve had incredible and personal works doubted, and authors having organized harassment campaigns over false Ai suspicions. People are getting really overzealous about being anti AI and it’s getting a bit irrational.
I think maybe the confusion has to do with how that list at the bottom is meant to be another quote rather than a summary, but since it is a code block that looks different from the other quotes that might imply that it isn’t a quote. Now that I’m looking at things more, in hindsight I should have done it like this:
I just didn’t realize it mattered much and figured it cluttered the page less the first way