The exchange is about Meta’s upcoming ActivityPub-enabled network Threads. Meta is calling for a meeting, his response is priceless!

  • Dashlander@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have mixed feelings about Facebook being a part of this, but I honestly don’t know if I’d want to get closer to Facebook. 💀

    • the_kgb@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      what are your mixed feelings? truly, what do you think is the positive of meta getting involved?

      • nzodd@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not op but one positive is making their users aware of the existence of the Fediverse and providing an opportunity for non-meta servers to take up some of those same users. The question is what means are available to do that without putting the community at risk.

        • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no chance a Meta version of an instance will do anything to make its users aware of alternatives. That’s beyond wishful thinking. Instead they’ll leverage the work done by others to make a walled garden for their users.