• brenticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keep in mind that the main comparison point for it was Skyrim, which was pretty much the previous RPG people got sucked into.

    The story was pretty good and it had a good number of meaningful side quests. Gwent was also a lot of fun, and the Blood and Wine DLC was another step above to keep the hype alive for longer. The combat can get fairly involved without feeling overly complex. Rather than the blank slate of many games of the era, you play as Geralt, who actually has relationships in the world to draw you in.

    Basically, rather than the unfocused sandbox of random stuff in Skyrim, it was a more involved story-rich experience that a lot of people appreciated.

    That said, the hype was ridiculous. It’s a very good RPG, not the second coming of Christ. It didn’t really do anything new, it was just a solid experience.

    • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s a very good RPG, not the second coming of Christ.

      That just shows what people want. Just a solid game, playable from start to finish. Due to time constraints i never finished Witcher 3 and barely made it past the prologue of BG3. But both those games are highly celebrated.

      They don’t reinvent the wheel. They are just very solid games and come without predatory pricing.