• watty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    So we allowed the arsonist to get the position when we could have had someone who was at worst ineffective.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      So we allowed the arsonist to get the position

      Yes, centrists absolutely did. You had the chance to protect democracy, but the filibuster was more important. So now instead of introspection, you blame the progressives you hate even more than the idea of living Palestinians.

      • watty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        You’re making a lot of assumptions here. I don’t even know what you think you are arguing against.

        You seemed to be arguing for not voting or voting third party rather than voting for Harris with the whole “firefighters” analogy.

        I was pointing out that by many not voting, or by voting third party, we’ve ended up with someone who is not only not a firefighter, to continue you analogy, but someone who is actively setting the fires.

        Now I hate democracy and progressives and Palestinians apparently? You’ve broken the thread here.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You seemed to be arguing for not voting or voting third party rather than voting for Harris with the whole “firefighters” analogy.

          That is the assumption from centrists every time someone wants them to be better, yes.

          • watty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Then what do you mean? No firefighters were running, therefore what? What would be the correct action for a person to take when voting in the 2024 presidential election?

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              No firefighters were running, therefore what?

              Therefore they should have grabbed a hose.

              • watty@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                How does that even apply?

                I’m a voter. Presidential election is happening. Both options suck, but one is extra awful.

                So the correct action is to run for president myself? And somehow build up grassroots support for myself over a series of 3 months sufficient to win? Too late.

                We need someone to do that, yea, but that’s no longer the action being taken in regards to the 2024 election. You still have to: vote Harris, vote Trump, vote for someone with no chance of winning, or not vote.

                So while you “grab a hose” which of those 4 actual actions are you taking?

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  How does that even apply?

                  You literally can’t imagine candidates changing for the better?

                  • watty@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    17 hours ago

                    I acknowledged that we could and should have better candidates. That doesn’t impact the fact that you have those 4 options when it comes to voting.

                    Regardless of what anyone does to push for better candidates, these are the options at that moment:

                    • Vote for Harris

                    • Vote for trump

                    • Vote for someone with no chance of winning

                    • Don’t vote.

                    Which of those options are you choosing? Or are you going to avoid the question again?