• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re claiming my choice has no impact, but it does because of supply and demand. It’s very small, but it’s still there.

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      this is just handwaiving. supply and demand isn’t a magic phrase that makes your actions have the desired effect.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s why I’m sharing the solution:

        Don’t contribute to the problem.

        If we don’t eat fish there would be close to no nets in the oceans.

          • x00z@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah because there’s too many people who are too stubborn to give it up.

            • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              regardless of the excuses you want to make for your plan’s ineffectiveness, I’m trying to find an effective solution

              • x00z@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Maybe you can get people to stop eating fish, so fishermen lose their job of destroying the sea.

                  • x00z@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    24 hours ago

                    I’m working on it.

                    Just a bit ago I posted it on Lemmy for people to have a thought about.