Swedish government wants a back door in signal for police and ‘Säpo’ (Swedish federation that checks for spies)

Let’s say that this becomes a law and Signal decides to withdraw from Sweden as they clearly state that they won’t implement a back door; would a citizen within the country still be able to use and access Signals services? Assuming that google play services probably would remove the Signal app within Sweden (which I also don’t use)

I just want the government to go f*ck themselves, y’know?

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Wherever a service with encryption exists any government in the world thinks they need to be the special child with the access to the contents.

    E2E with privately generated and held keys, have you published your PGP public key yet?

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      E2E with privately generated and held keys, have you published your PGP public key yet?

      Exactly. You can’t stop secure encryption.

      I remember in the very old days of the internet when only the US had strong encryption and thought it was some gotcha. They labeled it a weapon to prevent overseas export. Phil Zimmerman created PGP, lobbed the source into a book (protected under 1st amendment) then shipped it overseas.

      If strong encryption exists and people want to use it, you’re just not going to be able to stop them.

      • phase@lemmy.8th.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Reminds me of the story of immigrants who tatooed the algorithm on their back. It was illegal to send them back.