Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoFusion of [email protected] and [email protected]?feddit.orgimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1363arrow-down134
arrow-up1329arrow-down1imageFusion of [email protected] and [email protected]?feddit.orgPeter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squareblackberry@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·1 day agoisn’t the point of the fediverse to not consolidate?
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoOptions are better than useless limitations (ignoring scope creep)
minus-squarePriorityMotif@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoI created an instance for one specific community so that users won’t be affected by who federates from who (unless you’re a spam instance or something like that) [email protected]
minus-squarePeter_Arbeitslos@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·17 hours agoThere’re some different ideas in the thread now, basically a fediverse type of consolidation.
![Fusion of [email protected] and [email protected]?](https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/d1d07cd7-c35c-4748-87c7-5a20e1c68006.jpeg){kind=link}
isn’t the point of the fediverse to not consolidate?
Options are better than useless limitations (ignoring scope creep)
I created an instance for one specific community so that users won’t be affected by who federates from who (unless you’re a spam instance or something like that)
[email protected]
There’re some different ideas in the thread now, basically a fediverse type of consolidation.