Summary
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that enforcing a peace deal with Russia would require at least 200,000 allied troops, emphasizing Europe’s need to strengthen its defenses against Russian aggression.
Speaking at Davos, he called for greater EU investment in military technology and urged NATO membership as Ukraine’s best security guarantee, despite opposition from the U.S., Germany, Hungary, and Slovakia.
Zelenskyy criticized Kremlin demands to shrink Ukraine’s army and warned that if Russia wins in Ukraine, it could threaten other nations.
He totally will. Of course Ukraine can choose to continue on fighting without US support. That prolly won’t be very productive. At least not in terms of recovery of land, but they can delay total loss by at least a few years if they choose this.
The EU has helped more at this point. Of course it won’t be easy, but Ukraine can win on just EU support.
They can’t “win”. If by winning you mean take all their land back. But they can delay losing long enough for administration change in US maybe. EU is helping but it’s not enough, their stores are depleted. Also long term prospects in EU don’t look good for Ukraine. Many governments are shifting right.
New EU factories that have been in the works for years are just kicking in. Some of those EU factories are actually in Ukraine, companies like Rheinmetall have vested interests in not letting that go.
Time is not working for Russia, it never did. They have this year to push, then the EU alone will outmanufacture them.
The best Trump can give them is this one year window.
They “can” win, but a war of attrition is always difficult for all parties, and is not guaranteed.
Attrition will only work if they have the same starting point, but Russia has way more population than Ukraine.
Pure population is not the only factor that determines Russia’s and Ukraine’s success in the war. There are other factors such as economic output, public support, equipment, ammunition, military personnel, international influence, etc.
Right now the personnel limits for Ukraine and Russia aren’t necessarily about each sides’ male population, but over side affects that recruiting soldiers has. Ukraine is reluctant to recruit younger soldiers due to the effect it would have on the country’s future demographics. Russia is reluctant to recruit more soldiers due to the effect that would have on the country’s economy and by extension, war support. In Russia’s case, that led to paying North Korea for mercenaries instead of recruiting more soldiers.
Here are relevant videos on the topic that I recommend:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tHkwLSS-DE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiAWQ0h7g-g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf2vSoWsmgI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzR8BacYS6U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHUQmJCa3aY
As it stands right now, the most visible breaking points for each side’s war efforts are possibly the exhaustion of one of these: Ukrainian ammunition, Russian MBTs, and Russian economy.
There are other factors ongoing right now though that also make it less likely for each side to give up if a breaking point is reached, such as Ukraine’s lack of security guarantees, and the Russian economic fallout of ending the wartime economy.
All of these factors could definitely change though if the international climate changes, e.g. the EU gets more political support for the defense of Ukraine, or sanctions are lifted on Russia.