• lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing is that the botanical definition of berries doesn’t match perfectly with the everyday definition. That doesn’t make the latter wrong, it just has other applications

    • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Come up with an everyday definition for berry that includes strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries but excludes grapes, figs, and cherry tomatoes without identifying any particular fruit by name.

      • lugal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I could try to but I don’t need to. The fact that you could easily name some fruits that aren’t berries is proof enough that you have a concept of what a berry is and what isn’t. Coming up with a definition would be the next step.

        So I agree that “definition” is the wrong word. I should have said “concept”. Besides: what’s wrong with definitions that are just a list of elements?

      • Mmagnusson@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are grapes not considered berries in the anglosphere? In Icelandic they literally are named “Wine berries” and considered as such.

        • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          More evidence than the concept of “an every day definition of berry” is completely meaningless

          • Mmagnusson@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean, it isn’t meaningless, just culturally subjective and lacking a rigerous definition. Berries are a set of specific fruit, which fruit being included being determined by the culture in question base on percieved similarities and historic uses. We use it to quickly bring up the specific group and whatever vague characteristics we percieve them to share.

            So, the definition for berries that you seek is simply “the fruit people you’re interested in would point at and identify as a berry”, which is a vague definition and not rigerous at all, but most people would in fact think of the same thing you do if you say “I put berries on top of my cake”. If I ask my wife “hey, on your way home swing by the store and buy some berries, any type will do”, she will not bring a watermelon. She in fact will buy what we both agree are berries, and so the word has useful meaning.

            You’ll find most classifications humans have do this too. The real world is really good at refusing to fit into the neat boxes we made to classify it and the things in it, and yet we can still use them fine enough as long as we don’t get lost in semantics and wondering if a hot dog is a sandwich or cereal soup.